Home / Patterns / Forced Public Escalation

Pattern 5: Forced Public Escalation

Stage Jump: 2 → 5

Force a conflict into public channels where there is a permanent record, the opponent cannot save face, and coalition dynamics favor the escalator

The Pattern

Core Mechanism: Transform private resolution attempts into public confrontations, eliminating face-saving options and creating permanent records.

Private vs. Forced Public

Private Resolution	Forced Public Conflict
Both parties can adjust positions	Positions locked by public record
Face-saving retreat possible	Retreat = public admission
Limited audience	Community as witness
Focused on resolution	Focused on winning
Relationship preserved	Relationship damaged by public record

Example: Justin Morrison DM → Bravespace (December 2024)

Justin's Private Attempt

Justin Morrison December 2024 (Private DM)

[Conciliatory message attempting de-escalation]

Channel: Private Direct Message

Elle's Public Response

Elle December 2024 (Bravespace, public)

"Bravespace is where Noisebridgers work out differences, not private texts. I have not responded to your private text. I ignored it."

Channel: #bravespace (public, permanent record)
Effect: Forces Justin to respond publicly or appear to be ignoring community

Justin's Objection

Justin Morrison December 2024

"Also @Elle I did not consent for you to respond to my DM with a post here"

The Escalation

Justin's goal: Private de-escalation
Elle's action: Public confrontation citing fabricated rule
Result: Justin must now defend publicly or appear non-responsive
Impact: Justin disengaged from fundraising efforts

The Contradiction

Pattern: Forced public escalation is applied selectively - public when it advantages Elle, private when it doesn't.

When Public Works Against Elle

Elle September 2025

"I am getting tired of being dragged into Bravespace for the same thing over and over again."

Context: Being held accountable for ATL during mediation

When Elle is Overruled Publicly

Elle Sewing channel

"Would this private convo work better in DMs?"

Context: When public discussion doesn't favor Elle's position

The Pattern

Situation	Elle's Preference
Opponent attempts private de-escalation	Force public: "Bravespace is where..."
Elle being held accountable	Complain: "tired of being dragged"
Public discussion goes against Elle	Suggest private: "better in DMs?"

Why Forced Public Escalation Works

1. Eliminates Face-Saving Options

In private, both parties can adjust positions without admitting error. In public:

Changing position = public admission of being wrong
Community witnesses the entire exchange
Permanent record prevents reframing
Social pressure to maintain stated position

2. Locks Positions in Place

Once positions are stated publicly:

Must maintain consistency or lose credibility
Community expectations create pressure
Compromise becomes harder
All-or-nothing dynamic emerges

3. Creates Coalition Dynamics

Public conflicts naturally build coalitions:

Community members choose sides
Personal relationships affect alignment
Two-party conflict becomes group dynamic
Resolution requires satisfying coalitions, not just parties

4. Provides Permanent Record

Discord messages are searchable and permanent:

Can be quoted later as evidence

New members see historical conflicts

Reputational effects persist

Difficult to move past recorded statements

How This Escalates Unnecessarily

Example Analysis: Justin Morrison

If Private Discussion Succeeded

Justin and Elle work out fundraising approach
Both save face (no public record of disagreement)
Relationship preserved
Justin continues fundraising work

After Forced Public Escalation

Public confrontation in Bravespace
Justin must defend publicly
Permanent record of conflict
Justin disengages from fundraising
Community loses contributor

Legitimate vs. Forced Public Discussion

Important: Some issues do need public discussion (policy changes, community decisions, etc.). Forced public escalation is different - it's using publicity as a weapon.

Legitimate Public Discussion	Forced Public Escalation
Issue affects community (policy, resources)	Personal conflict between two people
Both parties agree to public forum	One party forces public against other's will
Private resolution attempted first	Private attempts rejected or ignored
Goal: Community input/decision	Goal: Win conflict via public pressure
Focuses on issue substance	Focuses on opponent's character

Key Questions

Does this issue require community input, or is it between two people?
Did the person attempting private discussion consent to going public?
Is the goal resolution or winning?
Would private resolution harm the community, or just deny tactical advantage?

Community Impact

Contributors Lost

Justin Morrison: Disengaged from fundraising after forced public confrontation
Chilling effect: Others may avoid private de-escalation attempts if they'll be forced public

Governance Challenges

Consent questions: Can private messages be posted publicly?
Channel purpose: Is Bravespace for community issues or personal conflicts?
Resolution options: Does community support multiple resolution paths?

Trust Erosion

Hesitance to attempt private de-escalation
Fear that any communication could be made public
Loss of safe space for working things out

How to Counter This Pattern

If You're the Target

Assert consent boundary: "I did not consent for you to respond to my DM here."
Propose return to private: "Let's continue this conversation privately."
Question the necessity: "Why does this need to be public?"
Focus on resolution: "I'm interested in resolving this, not winning a public debate."

If You're a Bystander

Question whether public is necessary: "Does this need community input?"
Support private resolution: "This sounds like something you two can work out."
Note consent issues: "Did both parties agree to public discussion?"
Avoid taking sides: Don't participate in forced coalition building

For Community Governance

Clarify channel purpose: What belongs in Bravespace vs. private?
Protect consent: Policy on posting private conversations publicly
Support multiple paths: Endorse both public and private resolution
Education: Teach when public vs. private is appropriate

What Makes This Stage-Skipping

Normal Conflict Progression (Stages 1-3)

Stage 1-2: Disagreement emerges
    Justin sends conciliatory private DM
    Attempt at private resolution

Stage 3: Work it out privately
    Find compromise
    Both save face
    Move forward

Forced Public Escalation (Skip to Stage 5)

Stage 2: Disagreement emerges
    Justin attempts private de-escalation

[SKIP private resolution]

Stage 5: Public loss of face
    Force into Bravespace
    Permanent public record
    Positions locked
    Face-saving impossible