It seems that we have different understandings of whether Josh is permitted at Noisebridge. We should probably discuss this at a meeting.
For reader reference: related [wiki](https://noisebridge.net/index.php?title=Consensus_Items_History&curid=2003&diff=40844&oldid=40740) [edits](https://noisebridge.net/index.php?title=Consensus_Items_History&diff=next&oldid=40844).
Tom, your recollection of our consensus process differs from the note take, facilitator, and at least 3 others present at the meeting (Kevin, James and John).
For reader reference: related [meeting notes edits](https://www.noisebridge.net/index.php?title=Meeting_Notes_2014_03_11&diff=40675&oldid=40673) and [discuss archives](https://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/2014-March/043362.html)
I am deeply concerned about this.
> On Mar 28, 2014, at 8:40 AM, kevinjos notifications@github.com wrote:
>
> Tom, your recollection of our consensus process differs from the note take, facilitator, and at least 3 others present at the meeting (Kevin, James and John).
>
> For reader reference: related meeting notes edits and discuss archives
>
> โ
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
See https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/commit/73abaac49befa7975b83e4cc3b8bcab7bb31f00e for clean revert
This reverts commit 60ff770ad9164057a25afa9629e36eb48af51c2b.
Conflicts:
people/banned.md