๐Ÿ“š HISTORICAL ARCHIVE - Noisebridge Cabal Controversy (March-April 2014) Return to Archive Home

Should we switch to board members with overlapping terms? #5

Open tildelowengrimm opened this issue on Mar 13, 2014
tildelowengrimm opened this issue on Mar 13, 2014

No description provided.

nthmost commented on Mar 14, 2014

The major downsides of this approach:
- yet another bureaucracy type thing for people to have to keep track of,
which means more communication and bookkeeping will have to be done.
- probably a less diverse board will result... current structure makes it
more likely for fringe candidates to succeed, producing a more diverse
board -- please do debate me on this speculative point.

Biggest upside: reduction in impact from cliquish board elections that
result in an all-jerk board.

Perhaps the upside(s) we want to acquire from this change can be achieved
in another way.

mmartiniere commented on Mar 25, 2014

While this is an interesting concept, I don't think it's necessary bureaucracy for us at this time. The benefits don't really outweigh the downsides, and we have more important issues to address like safety.